Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/14826
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHenshall, C-
dc.contributor.authorGarrison, LP-
dc.contributor.authorGriffin, AD-
dc.contributor.authorCoyle, D-
dc.contributor.authorLong, S-
dc.contributor.authorKhayat, ZA-
dc.contributor.authorAnger, DL-
dc.contributor.authorYu, R-
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-27T14:16:43Z-
dc.date.available2016-08-26-
dc.date.available2017-06-27T14:16:43Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research, 2016, 8 pp. 427 - 433en_US
dc.identifier.issn1178-6981-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/14826-
dc.description.abstract© 2016 Thompson et al.Objectives: To address the uncertainty associated with procuring pharmaceutical products, product listing agreements (PLAs) are increasingly being used to support responsible funding decisions in Canada and elsewhere. These agreements typically involve financial-based rebating initiatives or, less frequently, outcome-based contracts. A qualitative survey was conducted to improve the understanding of outcome-based and more innovative PLAs (IPLAs) based on input from Canadian and international key opinion leaders in the areas of drug manufacturing and reimbursement. Methods: Results from a structured literature review were used to inform survey development. Potential participants were invited via email to partake in the survey, which was conducted over phone or in person. Responses were compiled anonymously for review and reporting. Results: Twenty-one individuals participated in the survey, including health technology assessment (HTA) key opinion leaders (38%), pharmaceutical industry chief executive officers/ vice presidents (29%), ex-payers (19%), and current payers/drug plan managers/HTA (14%). The participants suggested that ~80%-95% of Canadian PLAs are financial-based rather than outcomes-based. They indicated that IPLAs offer important benefits to patients, payers, and manufacturers; however, several challenges limit their use (eg, administrative burden, lack of agreed-upon endpoint). They noted that IPLAs are useful in rapidly evolving therapeutic areas and those associated with high unmet need, a quantifiable endpoint, and/or robust data systems. The Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, the pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance, and other arms-length organizations could play important roles in identifying uncertainty and endpoints and brokering pan-Canadian PLAs. Industry should work collaboratively with payers to identify uncertainty and develop innovative mechanisms to address it. Conclusion: The survey results indicated that while challenging, use of IPLAs may be associated with various benefits. Collaboration among stakeholders remains key: Canadian agencies could play an important role in the success of these agreements, while industry should be proactive in offering solutions that will help improve outcomes across the entire health care system.en_US
dc.format.extent427 - 433-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectproduct listing agreementen_US
dc.subjectsurveyen_US
dc.subjectinnovativeen_US
dc.subjectCanadaen_US
dc.subjectCADTHen_US
dc.subjectpCPAen_US
dc.titleTargeting improved patient outcomes using innovative product listing agreements: A survey of canadian and international key opinion leadersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S96616-
dc.relation.isPartOfClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume8-
Appears in Collections:Health Economics Research Group (HERG)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf380.68 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.