Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/14548
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBeatty, A-
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-17T11:07:54Z-
dc.date.available2013-
dc.date.available2017-05-17T11:07:54Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationEmotion Review, 5 (4): pp. 414 - 422, (2013)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1754-0739-
dc.identifier.issn1754-0747-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/14548-
dc.description.abstractAn internal critique of anthropology in recent decades has shifted the focus and scope of anthropological work on emotion. In this article, I review the changes, explore the pros and cons of leading anthropological approaches and theories, and argue that—so far as anthropology is concerned—only detailed narrative accounts can do full justice to the complexity of emotions. A narrative approach captures both the particularity and the temporal dimension of emotion with greater fidelity than semantic, synchronic, and discourse-based approaches.en_US
dc.format.extent414 - 422-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.subjectanthropological approachesen_US
dc.subjectethnographyen_US
dc.subjecttranslationen_US
dc.subjectnarrativeen_US
dc.titleCurrent emotion research in anthropology: Reporting the fielden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/1754073913490045-
dc.relation.isPartOfEmotion Review-
pubs.issue4-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume5-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Social and Political Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.docx70.08 kBUnknownView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.