Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/14371
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEstcourt, CS-
dc.contributor.authorGibbs, J-
dc.contributor.authorSutcliffe, LJ-
dc.contributor.authorGkatzidou, V-
dc.contributor.authorTickle, L-
dc.contributor.authorHone, K-
dc.contributor.authorAicken, C-
dc.contributor.authorLowndes, CM-
dc.contributor.authorHarding-Esch, EM-
dc.contributor.authorEaton, S-
dc.contributor.authorOakeshott, P-
dc.contributor.authorSzczepura, A-
dc.contributor.authorAshcroft, RE-
dc.contributor.authorCopas, A-
dc.contributor.authorNettleship, A-
dc.contributor.authorSadiq, ST-
dc.contributor.authorSonnenberg, P-
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-05T13:48:10Z-
dc.date.available2017-03-
dc.date.available2017-04-05T13:48:10Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationThe Lancet Public Health, 2(4): pp. 182-190, (2017)en_US
dc.identifier.issn2468-2667-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/14371-
dc.description.abstractBackground Self-directed and internet-based care are key elements of eHealth agendas. We developed a complex online clinical and public health intervention, the eSexual Health Clinic (eSHC), in which patients with genital chlamydia are diagnosed and medically managed via an automated online clinical consultation, leading to antibiotic collection from a pharmacy. Partner notification, health promotion, and capture of surveillance data are integral aspects of the eSHC. We aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of the eSHC as an alternative to routine care in non-randomised, exploratory proof-of-concept studies. Methods Participants were untreated patients with chlamydia from genitourinary medicine clinics, untreated patients with chlamydia from six areas in England in the National Chlamydia Screening Programme's (NCSP) online postal testing service, or patients without chlamydia tested in the same six NCSP areas. All participants were aged 16 years or older. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with chlamydia who consented to the online chlamydia pathway who then received appropriate clinical management either exclusively through online treatment or via a combination of online management and face-to-face care. We captured adverse treatment outcomes. Findings Between July 21, 2014, and March 13, 2015, 2340 people used the eSHC. Of 197 eligible patients from genitourinary medicine clinics, 161 accessed results online. Of the 116 who consented to be included in the study, 112 (97%, 95% CI 91–99) received treatment, and 74 of those were treated exclusively online. Of the 146 eligible NCSP patients, 134 accessed their results online, and 105 consented to be included. 93 (89%, 95% CI 81–94) received treatment, and 60 were treated exclusively online. In both groups, median time to collection of treatment was within 1 day of receiving their diagnosis. 1776 (89%) of 1936 NCSP patients without chlamydia accessed results online. No adverse events were recorded. Interpretation The eSHC is safe and feasible for management of patients with chlamydia, with preliminary evidence of similar treatment outcomes to those in traditional services. This innovative model could help to address growing clinical and public health needs. A definitive trial is needed to assess the efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and public health impact of this intervention.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Electronic Self-Testing Instruments for Sexually Transmitted Infection Consortium is funded under the UK Clinical Research Collaboration Translational Infection Research Initiative supported by the Medical Research Council (grant number G0901608), with contributions to the grant from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, the National Institute for Health Research on behalf of the Department of Health, the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health Directorates, and the Wellcome Trust. We are very grateful to study participants; staff at participating genitourinary medicine clinics—Barts Health Sexual Health Services, Barts Health NHS Trust, Courtyard Clinic, St George’s Hospital, St George’s Health Care Services (particularly Gordon Proctor, Merle Symonds, Wendy Majewska, and Mariam Tarik); NCSP area teams (Bexley, Bromley, Greenwich, Lewisham, Lambeth, and Southwark); community pharmacists; Annette Wilkinson and Graham Hogan at the Doctors Laboratory; epiGenesys; the Quality and Clinical Standards Team (Celesio UK); Meroe Bleasdille, Rebecca Howell-Jones, Anthony Nardone, and Kevin Dunbar at Public Health England; Samantha Wu; Christine Chow; Mike Jackson (the Consortium’s programme manager, Ixscient); and the other members of the Consortium for their support: Philip Butcher, lead for Translational Microbiology work stream, Wamadeva Balachandran, lead for the Microengineering work stream; and Sanjeev Krishna and Graham Hart, chair and deputy chair, of the Consortium Management Committee.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectEHealthen_US
dc.subjectEPrescribingen_US
dc.subjectOnline clinical care pathwayen_US
dc.subjectSexual healthen_US
dc.subjectChlamydia trachomatisen_US
dc.subjectSexually transmitted infectionsen_US
dc.subjectPartner notificationen_US
dc.titleThe eSexual Health Clinic system for management, prevention, and control of sexually transmitted infections: exploratory studies in people testing for Chlamydia trachomatisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30034-8-
dc.relation.isPartOfThe Lancet Public Health-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Computer Science Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf879.62 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.