Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/14354
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTsamos, KM-
dc.contributor.authorGe, YT-
dc.contributor.authorSantosa, I-
dc.contributor.authorTassou, SA-
dc.contributor.authorBianchi, G-
dc.contributor.authorMylona, Z-
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-04T10:13:52Z-
dc.date.available2017-03-23-
dc.date.available2017-04-04T10:13:52Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationEnergy Conversion and Management, 2017en_US
dc.identifier.issn0196-8904-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/14354-
dc.description.abstractRefrigeration systems are crucial in retail food stores to ensure appropriate merchandising of food products. This paper compares four different CO2 refrigeration system configurations in terms of cooling performance, environmental impact, power consumption and annual running costs. The systems studied were the conventional booster refrigeration system with gas bypass (reference system), the all CO2 cascade system with gas bypass, a booster system with a gas bypass compressor, and integrated cascade all CO2 system with gas bypass compressor. The weather conditions of London, UK, and Athens, Greece, were used for the modelling of energy consumption and environmental impacts to represent moderate and warm climatic conditions respectively. The control strategies for the refrigeration systems were derived from experimental tests in the laboratory on a conventional booster refrigeration system. The results from the analysis showed that the CO2 booster system with gas bypass compressor can provide best performance with 5.0% energy savings for the warm climate and 3.65% for the moderate climate, followed by the integrated cascade all CO2 system with gas bypass compressor, with 3.6% and 2.1% savings over the reference system for the warm and moderate climates respectively.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by the Research Councils UK Energy programme, Grant No: EP/K011820/1 and GEA Searle, now Kevlion. The authors wish to acknowledge the cash and in-kind contributions of these organisations as well as the support received from Brunel University London and the RCUK National Centre for Sustainable Energy use in Food Chains (CSEF).en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titleEnergy analysis of alternative CO 2 refrigeration system configurations for retail food applications in moderate and warm climatesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.03.020-
dc.relation.isPartOfEnergy Conversion and Management-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf1.44 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.