Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/14304
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShaw, J-
dc.contributor.authorKontos, P-
dc.contributor.authorMartin, W-
dc.contributor.authorVictor, C-
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-26T09:54:28Z-
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-22T16:09:49Z-
dc.date.available2017-04-02-
dc.date.available2017-03-22T16:09:49Z-
dc.identifier.citationShaw, J.A., Kontos, P., Martin, W. and Victor, C. (2017) 'The institutional logic of integrated care: an ethnography of patient transitions', Journal of Health Organization and Management, 31 (1), pp. 82 - 95. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-06-2016-0123.-
dc.identifier.issn1477-7266-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/14304-
dc.description.abstract© Shaw, Kontos, Martin and Victor. Purpose: To use theories of institutional logics and institutional entrepreneurship to examine how and why macro-, meso-, and micro-level influences inter-relate in the implementation of integrated transitional care out of hospital in the English National Health Service. Design/Methodology/Approach: We conducted an ethnographic case study of a hospital and surrounding services within a large urban centre in England. Specific methods included qualitative interviews with patients/caregivers, health/social care providers, and organizational leaders; observations of hospital transition planning meetings, community “hub” meetings, and other instances of transition planning; reviews of patient records; and analysis of key policy documents. Analysis was iterative and informed by theory on institutional logics and institutional entrepreneurship. Findings: Organizational leaders at the meso-level of health and social care promoted a partnership logic of integrated care in response to conflicting institutional ideas found within a key macro-level policy enacted in 2003 (The Community Care (Delayed Discharges) Act). Through institutional entrepreneurship at the micro-level, the partnership logic became manifest in the form of relationship work among health and social care providers; they sought to build strong interpersonal relationships to enact more integrated transitional care. Originality/Value: Our study has three key implications. First, efforts to promote integrated care should strategically include institutional entrepreneurs at the organizational and clinical levels. Second, integrated care initiatives should emphasize relationship-building among health and social care providers. Finally, theoretical development on institutional logics should further examine the role of interpersonal relationships in facilitating the “spread” of logics between macro-, meso-, and micro-level influences on inter-organizational change.-
dc.description.sponsorshipCanadian Institutes of Health Research and Brunel University.-
dc.format.extent82 - 95-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEmerald-
dc.relation.replaceshttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/13227-
dc.relation.replaces2438/13227-
dc.rightsPublished by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial & non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at https://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode-
dc.titleThe Institutional Logic of Integrated Care: An Ethnography of Patient Transitions-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-06-2016-0123-
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Health Organization and Management-
pubs.issue1-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume31-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf204.25 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons