Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/13771
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLi, L-
dc.contributor.authorGe, YT-
dc.contributor.authorLuo, X-
dc.contributor.authorTassou, SA-
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-04T13:12:09Z-
dc.date.available2016-08-05-
dc.date.available2017-01-04T13:12:09Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationApplied Thermal Engineering, 106: pp. 1290 - 1299, (2016)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1359-4311-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/13771-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, a theoretical study is conducted to investigate and compare the performance of CO2 transcritical power cycles (T-CO2) and R245fa organic Rankine cycles (ORCs) using low-grade thermal energy to produce useful shaft or electrical power. Each power cycle consists of typical Rankine cycle components, such as a working fluid pump, gas generator or evaporator, turbine with electricity generator, air cooled condenser and recuperator (internal heat exchanger). The thermodynamic models of both cycles have been developed and are applied to calculate and compare the cycle thermal and exergy efficiencies at different operating conditions and control strategies. The simulation results show that the system performances for both cycles vary with different operating conditions. When the heat source (waste heat) temperature increases from 120 °C to 260 °C and heat sink (cooling air) temperature is reduced from 20 °C to 0 °C, both thermal efficiencies of R245fa ORC and T-CO2 with recuperator can significantly increase. On the other hand, R245fa ORC and T-CO2 exergy efficiencies increase with lower heat sink temperatures and generally decrease with higher heat source temperatures. In addition, with the same operating conditions and heat transfer assumptions, the thermal and exergy efficiencies of R245fa ORCs are both slightly higher than those of T-CO2. However, the efficiencies of both cycles can be enhanced by installing a recuperator in each system at specified operating conditions. Ultimately, optimal operating states can be predicted, with particular focus on the working fluid expander inlet pressure for both cycles.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors would like to acknowledge the support received from GEA Searle, Mentor Graphics Corp. and Research Councils UK (RCUK) for this research project.en_US
dc.format.extent1290 - 1299-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectCO2 transcritical power cycleen_US
dc.subjectR245fa organic Rankine cycleen_US
dc.subjectLow grade waste heaten_US
dc.subjectThermodynamic modelsen_US
dc.subjectEnergy and exergy analysisen_US
dc.titleThermodynamic analysis and comparison between CO<inf>2</inf> transcritical power cycles and R245fa organic Rankine cycles for low grade heat to power energy conversionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.06.132-
dc.relation.isPartOfApplied Thermal Engineering-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume106-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf2.01 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.