1. Brunel University Research Archive
  2. College of Business, Arts and Social Sciences
  3. Brunel Business School
  4. Brunel Business School Research Papers
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/13415
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAlmuftah, H-
dc.contributor.authorWeerakkody, V-
dc.contributor.authorSivarajah, U-
dc.contributor.editorScholl, HJ-
dc.contributor.editorGlassey, O-
dc.contributor.editorJanssen, M-
dc.contributor.editorKlievink, B-
dc.contributor.editorLindgren, I-
dc.contributor.editorParycek, P-
dc.contributor.editorTambouris, E-
dc.contributor.editorWimmer, M-
dc.contributor.editorJanowski, T-
dc.contributor.editorSoares, DS-
dc.coverage.spatialUniv Minho, Guimaraes, PORTUGAL-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-26T11:43:32Z-
dc.date.available2016-01-01-
dc.date.available2016-10-26T11:43:32Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT AND ELECTRONIC PARTICIPATION, 23(11): pp. 69 - 79, (2016)en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-61499-669-9-
dc.identifier.issnhttp://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000383380900008&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=f12c8c83318cf2733e615e54d9ed7ad5-
dc.identifier.issnhttp://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000383380900008&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=f12c8c83318cf2733e615e54d9ed7ad5-
dc.identifier.issn1871-1073-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/13415-
dc.description.abstractThe e-government maturity model has dissimilar stages that range from basic to advance online interaction competence. E-government’s portals use the stages to determine maturity. The aim of this paper is to evaluate e-government maturity models through a comprehensive review of related literature by identifying and mapping cohesions across the models. Apparently, the paper picks seventeen different e-government maturity models and makes contrasts and comparisons using a qualitative meta-synthesis method. Ideally, the paper draws two key results namely presence, communication and integration are main stages involved in all the maturity models and the level of interaction and complexity are found in all models.en_US
dc.format.extent69 - 79 (11)-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIOS PRESSen_US
dc.source15th IFIP Electronic Government (EGOV) / 8th Electronic Participation (ePart) Conference-
dc.source15th IFIP Electronic Government (EGOV) / 8th Electronic Participation (ePart) Conference-
dc.subjectScience & Technologyen_US
dc.subjectSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectTechnologyen_US
dc.subjectInformation Science & Library Scienceen_US
dc.subjectPolitical Scienceen_US
dc.subjectGovernment & Lawen_US
dc.subjectMaturity modelen_US
dc.subjecte-Governmenten_US
dc.subjectQualitative meta-synthesisen_US
dc.subjectSOCIAL MEDIAen_US
dc.subjectMUNICIPALITIESen_US
dc.titleComparing and Contrasting e-Government Maturity Models: A Qualitative-Meta Synthesisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-670-5-69-
dc.relation.isPartOfELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT AND ELECTRONIC PARTICIPATION-
pubs.finish-date2016-09-08-
pubs.finish-date2016-09-08-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.start-date2016-09-05-
pubs.start-date2016-09-05-
pubs.volume23-
Appears in Collections:Brunel Business School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf227.26 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.