Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/12946
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorIbrahim, Y-
dc.contributor.authorHowarth, A-
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-15T11:09:16Z-
dc.date.available2016-07-14-
dc.date.available2016-07-15T11:09:16Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationSocial Identities, 2016en_US
dc.identifier.issn1350-4630-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13504630.2016.1207512-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/12946-
dc.description.abstractFood and consumption practices are cultural symbols of communities, nations, identity and a collective imaginary which bind people in complex ways. The media framed the 2013 horsemeat scandal by fusing discourses beyond the politics of food. Three recurrent media frames and dominant discourses converged with wider political debates and cultural stereotypes in circulation in the media around immigration and intertextual discourse on historical food scandals. What this reveals is how food consumption and food-related scandals give rise to affective media debates and frames which invoke fear of the other and the transgression of a sacred British identity, often juxtaposing ‘Britishness’ with a constructed ‘Otherness’.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.subjectHorsemeaten_US
dc.subjectScandalen_US
dc.subjectOtheringen_US
dc.subjectDeceptionen_US
dc.subjectEastern Europeen_US
dc.titleContamination, deception and ‘othering’: The media framing of the horsemeat scandalen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2016.1207512-
dc.relation.isPartOfSocial Identities-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Social and Political Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf418.65 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.