Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/12388
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDel Lucchese, F-
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, CA-
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-22T13:54:01Z-
dc.date.available2016-
dc.date.available2016-03-22T13:54:01Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationPhilosophy Today, 60: pp. 1 - 6, (2016)en_US
dc.identifier.issn0031-8256-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/purchase?openform&fp=philtoday&id=philtoday_2016_0060_0001_0001_0006-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/12388-
dc.description.abstractAlterity and Otherness have often been the privileged field of contemplation within Western philosophy. Since the Presocratic philosophers, Being has been defined in relation to – and more often opposed to – non-Being, just as Goodness has been considered in relation to Evil, Beauty in relation to the Ugly, Society in relation to Nature, and the examples could be multiplied ad libitum. Every identity is shaped in opposition to an excluded other, an outside, or some thing. Identity and alterity are thus constructed as two inseparable sides of a single, coherent philosophical discourse, or rather a field of various discourses that comprise a philosophy, associated with - although not limited to - the early centuries of what we call modernity.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 6-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPhilosophy Documentation Centeren_US
dc.titleThe power of the Monstrous: An introduction to the special issueen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/ 10.5840/philtoday2015121194-
dc.relation.isPartOfPhilosophy Today-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume60-
Appears in Collections:Brunel Law School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf436.37 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.