Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/12282
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStephens, N-
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-07T13:59:05Z-
dc.date.available2013-11-27-
dc.date.available2016-03-07T13:59:05Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationConfigurations, 21(2): pp. 159 - 181, (2013)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1063-1801-
dc.identifier.issn1080-6520-
dc.identifier.urihttp://muse.jhu.edu/journals/configurations/v021/21.2.stephens.html-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/12282-
dc.description.abstractOver the last decade, several clusters of scientists have been using animal cells in an attempt to grow meat. Known as in vitro, or cultured, meat, the technology involves tissue engineering muscle cells for potential consumption as food. Those supporting the technology articulate a diversity of potential benefits in producing meat in this way, which include environmental-, health-, innovation-, and animal-welfare-related benefits. This essay reports on interviews with scientists and animal activists involved in making and promoting in vitro meat (IVM). While the technology remains in its infancy, its promotion has assertively been pursued with a set of promissory narratives designed to enroll potential funders, commercial investors, and consumers. The essay explores the ethical boundary-work-the drawing of boundaries around what constitutes ethical scientific practice- pursued in the creation of socio-technical expectations around IVM. In particular, it focuses on the emergence of an animal-libratory promissory narrative by exploring how ethically correct practice toward animals is constructed and used to underpin notions of what IVM is and what it can do. The key contributions of the essay are to provide a detailed analysis of the situated ethics of IVM, and to make explicit the relatedness among ethics, promise, and ontology.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work is part of the research program of the ESRC Genomic Network at Cesagen (ESRC Centre for Economic and Social Aspects of Genomics). It was also supported by the Wellcome Trust (WT096541MA). The research leading to this publication has received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) under grant number 288971 (EPINET). It was also supported by a visiting scholarship to the CGS Centre for Society and Genomics in the Netherlands (May–July 2011).en_US
dc.format.extent159 - 181-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherThe Johns Hopkins University Pressen_US
dc.subjectIn Vitro Meat (IVM).en_US
dc.subjectEthical boundary-worken_US
dc.subjectAnimal-libratoryen_US
dc.titleGrowing meat in laboratories: The promise, ontology, and ethical boundary-work of using muscle cells to make fooden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1353/con.2013.0013-
dc.relation.isPartOfConfigurations-
pubs.issue2-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume21-
Appears in Collections:Institute for the Environment

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf262.23 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.