Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/11980
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLowe, PS-
dc.contributor.authorSanderson, R-
dc.contributor.authorBoulgouris, NV-
dc.contributor.authorGan, TH-
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-01T10:45:03Z-
dc.date.available2016-02-01T10:45:03Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationNondestructive Testing and Evaluation, (2015)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1477-2671-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10589759.2015.1093628-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/11980-
dc.descriptionThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation on 23/11/2015, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10589759.2015.1093628.en_US
dc.description.abstractUltrasonic guided wave inspection is widely used for scanning prismatic structures such as pipes for metal loss. Recent research has investigated focusing the sound energy into predetermined regions of a pipe in order to enhance the defect sensitivity. This paper presents an active focusing technique which is based on a combination of numerical simulation and time reversal concept. The proposed technique is empirically validated using a 3D laser vibrometry measurement of the focal spot. The defect sensitivity of the proposed technique is compared with conventional active focusing, time reversal focusing and synthetic focusing through an empirically validated finite element parametric study. Based on the results, the proposed technique achieves approximately 10 dB improvement of signal-to-coherent-noise ratio compared to the conventional active focusing and time reversal focusing. It is also demonstrated that the proposed technique to have an amplitude gain of around 5 dB over synthetic focusing for defects <0.5λs. The proposed technique is shown to have the potential to improve the reliably detectable flaw size in guided wave inspection from 9% to less than 1% cross-sectional area loss.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipTWI Ltd and the Center for Electronic System Research (CESR) of Brunel University.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.rightsThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation on 23/11/2015, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10589759.2015.1093628.en_US
dc.subjectUltrasonic guided wavesen_US
dc.subjectActive focusingen_US
dc.subjectDefect sensitivityen_US
dc.subjectFinite element analysisen_US
dc.subjectPipe inspectionen_US
dc.titleHybrid active focusing with adaptive dispersion for higher defect sensitivity in guided wave inspection of cylindrical structuresen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10589759.2015.1093628-
dc.relation.isPartOfNondestructive Testing and Evaluation-
pubs.publication-statusAccepted-
pubs.publication-statusAccepted-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Electronic and Electrical Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation on 23/11/2015, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10589759.2015.1093628.1.21 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.