Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/11875
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJones, MO-
dc.contributor.authorTroup, F-
dc.contributor.authorNugus, J-
dc.contributor.authorRoughton, M-
dc.contributor.authorHodson, M-
dc.contributor.authorRayner, C-
dc.contributor.authorBowen, F-
dc.contributor.authorPryor, J-
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-20T16:57:06Z-
dc.date.available2016-01-20T16:57:06Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationDisability and Rehabilitation, 37, (9): pp. 763-770, (2015)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1464-5165-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/09638288.2014.941020-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/11875-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Dysfunctional breathing (DB) is associated with an abnormal breathing pattern, unexplained breathlessness and significant patient morbidity. Treatment involves breathing retraining through respiratory physiotherapy. Recently, manual therapy (MT) has also been used, but no evidence exists to validate its use. This study sought to investigate whether MT produces additional benefit when compared with breathing retraining alone in patients with DB. Methods: Sixty subjects with primary DB were randomised into either breathing retraining (standard treatment; n¼30) or breathing retraining plus MT (intervention; n¼30) group. Both the groups received standardised respiratory physiotherapy, which included: DB education, breathing retraining, home regimen, and audio disc. Intervention group subjects additionally received MT following further assessment. Data from 57 subjects were analysed. Results: At baseline, standard treatment group subjects were statistically younger (41.7 + 13.5 versus 50.8 + 13.0 years; p¼0.001) with higher Nijmegen scores (38.6 + 9.5 versus 31.5 + 6.9; p¼0.001). However, no significant difference was found between the groups for primary outcome Nijmegen score (95% CI ( 1.1, 6.6) p¼0.162), or any secondary outcomes (Hospital Anxiety & Depression Score, spirometry or exercise tolerance). Conclusion: Breathing retraining is currently the mainstay of treatment for patients with DB. The results of this study suggest MT provides no additional benefit in this patient group.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipJuliana Burgess, Dr Robert Wilson, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, and Dr Andy Jones foren_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.subjectBreathing exercisesen_US
dc.subjectDysfunctional breathingen_US
dc.subjectManual therapyen_US
dc.subjectPhysiologyen_US
dc.titleDoes Manual Therapy Provide Additional Benefit To Breathing Retraining In The Management Of Dysfunctional Breathing? A Randomised Controlled Trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2014.941020-
dc.relation.isPartOfDisability and Rehabilitation-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf627.35 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.