Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/11741
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Cheung, KL | - |
dc.contributor.author | Evers, SMAA | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hiligsmann, M | - |
dc.contributor.author | Voko, K | - |
dc.contributor.author | Pokhrel, S | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jones, T | - |
dc.contributor.author | Munoz, C | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wolfenstetter, SB | - |
dc.contributor.author | Józwiak-Hagymásy, J | - |
dc.contributor.author | de Vries, H | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-12-10T10:54:27Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2015-12-10T10:54:27Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Health Policy, 120: pp. 46-54, (2016) | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1872-6054 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851015002997 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/11741 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Despite an increased number of economic evaluations of tobacco control interventions, the uptake by stakeholders continues to be limited. Understanding the underlying mechanism in adopting such economic decision-support tools by stakeholders is therefore important. By applying the I-Change Model, this study aims to identify which factors determine potential uptake of an economic decision-support tool, i.e. the Return on Investment tool. Methods: Stakeholders (decision-makers, purchasers of services/pharma products, professionals/service providers, evidence generators and advocates of health promotion) were interviewed in five countries, using an I-Change based questionnaire. MANOVA’s were conducted to assess differences between intenders and non-intenders regarding beliefs. A multiple regression analysis was conducted to identify the main explanatory variables of intention to use an economic decision-support tool. Findings: Ninety-three stakeholders participated. Significant differences in beliefs were found between non-intenders and intenders: risk perception, attitude, social support, and self-efficacy towards using the tool. Regression showed that demographics, pre-motivational, and motivational factors explained 69% of the variation in intention. Discussion: This study is the first to provide a theoretical framework to understand differences in beliefs between stakeholders who do or do not intend to use economic decision-support tools, and empirically corroborating the framework. This contributes to our understanding of the facilitators and barriers to the uptake of these studies. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme Grant No. 602270 | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.title | Understanding the stakeholders’ intention to use economic decision-support tools: A cross-sectional study with the Tobacco Return on Investment tool | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.11.004 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Health Policy | - |
pubs.publication-status | Accepted | - |
pubs.publication-status | Accepted | - |
Appears in Collections: | Institute for the Environment |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Fulltext.pdf | 547.47 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.