Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/11229
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBalmer, JMT-
dc.contributor.authorBurghausen, M-
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-13T14:30:19Z-
dc.date.available2015-08-13T14:30:19Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Brand Management (2015) 22 (6/6), Forthcomingen_US
dc.identifier.issn1479-1803-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/11229-
dc.description.abstractIn this article we formally introduce and explicate the organisational heritage notion. The authors conclude organisational heritage can be designated in three broad ways as: (1) organisational heritage identity as the perceived and reminisced omni-temporal traits – both formal/normative and utilitarian/societal – of organisational members’ work organisation; (2) organisational heritage identification as organisational members’ identification/self-categorisation vis-à-vis these perceived and reminisced omni-temporal traits of their work organisation, and (3) organisational heritage cultural identification as 0rganisational members’ multi-generational identification/self-categorisation vis-à-vis the perceived and reminisced omni-temporal traits of their work organisation’s corporate culture. To date, advances in heritage studies at the institutional-level have primarily taken place within the broad corporate marketing paradigm. However, we are mindful of developments in the organisational memory field and the need to address and engage with organisational behaviour/management scholarship in the broad organisational identity domain. The realisation that there is a distinct genus of corporate heritage institution (corporate heritage identity) and brand (corporate heritage brand) represents a seismic shift in how scholars theorise about heritage institutions and corporate heritage brands and how the aforementioned are managed. In the development of a field concept introduction and explanation is a key means through which an area can progress and the explicit aim of this article is to achieve the aforementioned by our elucidation of the organisational heritage notion. We argue the literatures on corporate heritage identity, organisational identity, and organisational memory are of assistance in appreciating the saliency of organisational heritage. As such, by building on embryonic scholarship in the corporate heritage this article aims to explicate the nature and significance of organisational heritage. The implications of organisational heritage for corporate heritage brands are also delineated.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPalgrave Macmillanen_US
dc.subjectOrganisational heritageen_US
dc.subjectOrganizational heritageen_US
dc.subjectCorporate heritageen_US
dc.subjectOrganisational identityen_US
dc.subjectOrganisational memoryen_US
dc.subjectOrganizational memoryen_US
dc.subjectOrganizational identityen_US
dc.subjectorganisational heritage identityen_US
dc.subjectOrganisational heritage identificationen_US
dc.subjectOrganisational heritage culture identificationen_US
dc.titleIntroducing organisational heritage: Linking corporate heritage, organisational identity, and organisational memoryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Brand Management-
pubs.issue6/6-
pubs.publication-statusAccepted-
pubs.publication-statusAccepted-
pubs.volume22-
Appears in Collections:Brunel Business School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.docx185.21 kBUnknownView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.