Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/10932
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDerrick, GE-
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-29T09:35:24Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-30-
dc.date.available2015-05-29T09:35:24Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationThe Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(1): 105 - 122, (February 2015)en_US
dc.identifier.issn0892-9912-
dc.identifier.issn1573-7047-
dc.identifier.urihttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10961-014-9343-1-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/10932-
dc.description.abstractEstablishing technology transfer offices (TTOs) within research organizations is one initiative used to facilitate successful commercialization. Research organizations may choose to either outsource the commercialization expertise (separation model) or incorporate it within their organizational structure (integration model). Ensuring the success of these integration TTOs, face many challenges, including challenges based on tensions from researchers within research organizations about the perceived differences in opinions, rules, norms and reward systems of research and commercialization. Using qualitative data from interviews from researchers and the integrated TTO personnel, this paper describes the interactions of researchers and integrated TTO personnel in five Australian medical research organizations. Despite strong researcher concerns and fears about research commercialization, a number of strategies employed by integrated TTOs were identified to encourage researcher engagement. These include the flexibility of TTO policies to researcher needs; offering collective incentives; and being visible within the organization. © 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York.en_US
dc.languageeng-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer USen_US
dc.subjectCommercializationen_US
dc.subjectQualitative researchen_US
dc.subjectResearch Managementen_US
dc.subjectTechnology Transfer Office (TTO)en_US
dc.titleIntegration versus separation: structure and strategies of the technology transfer office (TTO) in medical research organizationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9343-1-
dc.relation.isPartOfThe Journal of Technology Transfer-
pubs.publication-statusAccepted-
pubs.publication-statusAccepted-
pubs.publication-statusAccepted-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Staff by College/Department/Division-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Staff by College/Department/Division/College of Health and Life Sciences-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Staff by College/Department/Division/College of Health and Life Sciences/Dept of Life Sciences-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Staff by College/Department/Division/College of Health and Life Sciences/Dept of Life Sciences/Biological Sciences-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Staff by Institute/Theme-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Staff by Institute/Theme/Institute of Environmental, Health and Societies-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Staff by Institute/Theme/Institute of Environmental, Health and Societies/Health Economics-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Specialist Centres-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Specialist Centres/HERG-
Appears in Collections:Health Economics Research Group (HERG)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.rtf186.85 kBMicrosoft WordView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.