Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/10920
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNjuki, R-
dc.contributor.authorAbuya, T-
dc.contributor.authorKimani, J-
dc.contributor.authorKanya, L-
dc.contributor.authorKorongo, A-
dc.contributor.authorMukunya, C-
dc.contributor.authorBracke, P-
dc.contributor.authorBellows, B-
dc.contributor.authorWarren, CE-
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-27T10:47:42Z-
dc.date.available2015-05-23-
dc.date.available2015-05-27T10:47:42Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Health Services Research, 15: 206, (May 2015)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1472-6963-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/15/206-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/10920-
dc.descriptionThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground - Current assessments on Output-Based Aid (OBA) programs have paid limited attention to the experiences and perceptions of the healthcare providers and facility managers. This study examines the knowledge, attitudes, and experiences of healthcare providers and facility managers in the Kenya reproductive health output-based approach voucher program. Methods - A total of 69 in-depth interviews with healthcare providers and facility managers in 30 voucher accredited facilities were conducted. The study hypothesized that a voucher program would be associated with improvements in reproductive health service provision. Data were transcribed and analysed by adopting a thematic framework analysis approach. A combination of inductive and deductive analysis was conducted based on previous research and project documents. Results - Facility managers and providers viewed the RH-OBA program as a feasible system for increasing service utilization and improving quality of care. Perceived benefits of the program included stimulation of competition between facilities and capital investment in most facilities. Awareness of family planning (FP) and gender-based violence (GBV) recovery services voucher, however, remained lower than the maternal health voucher service. Relations between the voucher management agency and accredited facilities as well as existing health systems challenges affect program functions. Conclusions - Public and private sector healthcare providers and facility managers perceive value in the voucher program as a healthcare financing model. They recognize that it has the potential to significantly increase demand for reproductive health services, improve quality of care and reduce inequities in the use of reproductive health services. To improve program functioning going forward, there is need to ensure the benefit package and criteria for beneficiary identification are well understood and that the public facilities are permitted greater autonomy to utilize revenue generated from the voucher program.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to the Population Council as part of a multi country study evaluation of voucher-andaccreditation interventions. Grant number 51761.en_US
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBiomed Centralen_US
dc.subjectHealthcare financing modelen_US
dc.subjectPublic and private sector healthcareen_US
dc.subjectVoucher programen_US
dc.subjectReproductive health servicesen_US
dc.subjectHealthcare providersen_US
dc.subjectFacility managersen_US
dc.subjectKenyaen_US
dc.titleDoes a voucher program improve reproductive health service delivery and access in Kenya?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0860-x-
dc.relation.isPartOfBMC Health Services Research-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume15-
pubs.volume15-
Appears in Collections:Health Economics Research Group (HERG)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf400.19 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.