Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/10800
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWang, F-
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-11T09:53:45Z-
dc.date.available2008-
dc.date.available2015-05-11T09:53:45Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of International Commercial Law and Technology, 2008, 3 (4), pp. 233 - 241en_US
dc.identifier.issn1901-8401-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.jiclt.com/index.php/jiclt/article/view/65-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/10800-
dc.description.abstractIn an era of information technology, businesses through the use of the boundless Internet can enter into international electronic contracts from anywhere in the world. The potential for cross-border disputes in electronic contracts is obviously much greater than in a paper-based environment, where a high degree of commercial contracts are domestic in nature. Can the traditional rules on jurisdiction, which are geographically orientated and generally rely on the place of performance, apply to the modern electronic contract disputes? This paper will analyse the EU and US approaches for determining jurisdiction in e-contracting cases and discuss the possibility of proposing specific jurisdiction rules for online contracts.en_US
dc.format.extent233 - 241-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectInternational Electronic Contractsen_US
dc.subjectInformation Technologyen_US
dc.subjectJurisdictionen_US
dc.subjectOnline Contractsen_US
dc.titleObstacles and Solutions to Internet Jurisdiction: A Comparative Analysis of the EU and US Lawsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of International Commercial Law and Technology-
pubs.edition2008-
pubs.edition2008-
pubs.issue4-
pubs.issue4-
pubs.volume3-
pubs.volume3-
Appears in Collections:Law

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf97.52 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.