Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/10432
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKanya, L-
dc.contributor.authorNjuki, R-
dc.contributor.authorObare, F-
dc.contributor.authorWarren, C-
dc.contributor.authorAbuya, T-
dc.contributor.authorOkal, J-
dc.contributor.authorMukuna, W-
dc.contributor.authorAskew, I-
dc.contributor.authorBracke, P-
dc.contributor.authorBellows, B-
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-18T10:36:34Z-
dc.date.available2013-07-16-
dc.date.available2015-03-18T10:36:34Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Public Health, 13: 660, (2013)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1471-2458-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/13/660-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/10432-
dc.descriptionThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Research on demand-side health care financing approaches such as output-based aid (OBA) programs have focused on evaluating the role of the programs improving such outcomes as utilization of services and quality of services with limited focus on the experiences and perceptions of the target communities. This paper examines community members’ views of the output-based aid voucher program in Kenya. Methods: A household survey was conducted in 2010 among 1,336 women aged 15-49 years living in the catchment areas of contracted health facilities in three districts participating in the voucher program (Kisumu, Kiambu and Kitui). Twenty seven focus group discussions were conducted with voucher users, non-users, opinion leaders and voucher distributors in the three districts as well as in Nairobi. Analysis of the quantitative data involved frequency distributions and cross-tabulations. Qualitative data were transcribed and analyzed by adopting framework analysis and further triangulation of themes across respondents. Results: Majority (84%) of survey respondents had heard about the safe motherhood voucher compared to 24% and 1% that had heard about the family planning and gender-based violence recovery services (GBVRS) vouchers respectively. Similarly, 20% of the respondents had used the safe motherhood voucher compared to 2% for family planning and none for the GBVRS vouchers. From the community members’ perspectives, the voucher program is associated with improvements in access to health services for poor women, improved quality of care, and empowerment of women to make health care decisions. However, community members cited difficulties in accessing some accredited health facilities, limitations with the system of selling vouchers, lack of male involvement in women’s reproductive health issues, and poor understanding of the benefits associated with purchasing the voucher. Conclusion: The findings of this paper showed that the voucher program in Kenya is viewed by the community members as a feasible system for increasing service utilization, improving quality of care, and reducing financial barriers to accessing reproductive health services. However, the techniques of program execution such as proper information and availability of the distributors as well as local attitudes influence whether vouchers are purchased and used.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipBill and Melinda Gates Foundationen_US
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBiomed Centralen_US
dc.subjectAid voucher programen_US
dc.subjectFinancial barriersen_US
dc.subjectKenyaen_US
dc.subjectReproductive health servicesen_US
dc.titleCommunity experiences and perceptions of reproductive health vouchers in Kenyaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-660-
dc.relation.isPartOfBMC Public Health-
dc.relation.isPartOfBMC Public Health-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/PhD Students-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/PhD Students/PhD Students-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Specialist Centres-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Specialist Centres/HERG-
Appears in Collections:Health Economics Research Group (HERG)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf301.88 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.