Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/10367
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBiesta, G-
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-09T16:33:45Z-
dc.date.available2014-11-18-
dc.date.available2015-03-09T16:33:45Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationStudies in Philosophy and Education, (18 November 2014)en_US
dc.identifier.issn0039-3746-
dc.identifier.issn1573-191X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11217-014-9454-z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/10367-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper I explore the relationship between teaching and learning. Whereas particularly in the English language the relationship between teaching and learning has become so intimate that it often looks as if ‘teaching and learning’ has become one word, I not only argue for the importance of keeping teaching and learning apart from each other, but also provide a number of arguments for suggesting that learning may not be the one and only option for teaching to aim for. I explore this idea through a discussion of the relationship between teaching and learning, both at a conceptual and at an existential level. I discuss the limitations of the language of learning as an educational language, point at the political work that is being done through the language of learning, and raise epistemological and existential questions about the identity of the learner, particularly with regard to the question what it means to be in and with the world in terms of learning as comprehension and sense making. Through this I seek to suggest that learning is only one possible aim for teaching and that the learner identity and the learning way of engaging with the world puts the learner in a very specific position vis-à-vis the world, one where the learner remains in the centre and the world appears as object for the learner’s acts of learning. That it is possible to teach without requesting from students that they learn, comprehend and make sense, is demonstrated through a brief account of a course in which students were explicitly asked to refrain from learning and were instead asked to adopt a concept. I show how this request opened up very different existential possibilities for the students and argue that if we value such existential possibilities, there may be good reasons for freeing teaching from learning.en_US
dc.languageeng-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Netherlandsen_US
dc.subjectAdoptionen_US
dc.subjectBeing addresseden_US
dc.subjectLearnificationen_US
dc.subjectLearningen_US
dc.subjectStudentingen_US
dc.subjectTeachingen_US
dc.titleFreeing teaching from learning: Opening up existential possibilities in educational relationshipsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11217-014-9454-z-
dc.relation.isPartOfStudies in Philosophy and Education-
dc.relation.isPartOfStudies in Philosophy and Education-
pubs.publication-statusAccepted-
pubs.publication-statusAccepted-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Staff by College/Department/Division-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Staff by College/Department/Division/College of Business, Arts and Social Sciences-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Staff by College/Department/Division/College of Business, Arts and Social Sciences/Dept of Education-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Staff by College/Department/Division/College of Business, Arts and Social Sciences/Dept of Education/Education-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Education Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.docx183.64 kBUnknownView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.