Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/10210
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAhmi, A-
dc.contributor.authorKent, S-
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-13T09:54:09Z-
dc.date.available2013-
dc.date.available2015-02-13T09:54:09Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationManagerial Auditing Journal, 28 (2): 88 - 113, (2013)en_US
dc.identifier.issn0268-6902-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/full/10.1108/02686901311284522-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/10210-
dc.description.abstractPurpose – Generalized Audit Software (GAS) is the tool use by auditors to automate various audit tasks. As most accounting transactions are now computerized, auditing of accounting data is also expected to be computerized as well. While GAS is the most popular Computer Assisted Audit Tools and Technique (CAATTs), research shows that there is little evidence that GAS has been universally adopted by external auditors. This study seeks to investigate the utilization of GAS by external auditors in the UK. This study focuses on small and medium sized audit firms in the UK whereas most other GAS studies have examined ‘Big 4’ firms. Registered statutory auditors have been selected as a sample. Design/methodology/approach – A framework was developed to identify a range of relevant factors which are important when considering the application of GAS. A web-based survey has been used to gather the perceptions based on the responses from 205 statutory auditors across the UK. The questions posed to respondents were mapped against the framework. Findings – The research finds that the utilization of GAS is unusually low among audit firms in the UK. About 73% of external auditors make no use of GAS, due to the limited perceived benefit of using GAS for auditing small clients. While some respondents recognized the advantages of GAS, they were put off by what they believed to be high implementation costs; significant learning curve and adoption process; and lack of ease of use – they showed a preference for using traditional manual auditing methods instead. Research limitations/implications – This study focuses on small and medium sized auditors, and as such the results study cannot be extrapolated to Big 4 auditors. Consequently the responses and conclusions are relevant to the use of GAS during audits of smaller and medium sized companies which make up the client base of such audit firms. Originality/value – This is one of the few studies that have sought to research the utilization of GAS by the external auditor.en_US
dc.format.extent88 - 113-
dc.format.extent88 - 113-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEmerald Group Publishing Limiteden_US
dc.subjectComputerized auditingen_US
dc.subjectGeneralized audit softwareen_US
dc.subjectComputerized Assisted audit tools and techniquesen_US
dc.subjectSmall to medium‐sized enterprisesen_US
dc.subjectUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.titleThe utilisation of Generalised Audit Software (GAS) by external auditorsen_US
dc.typeResearch Paperen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02686901311284522-
dc.relation.isPartOfManagerial Auditing Journal-
dc.relation.isPartOfManagerial Auditing Journal-
pubs.issue2-
pubs.issue2-
pubs.volume28-
pubs.volume28-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Staff by College/Department/Division-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Staff by College/Department/Division/College of Engineering, Design and Physical Sciences-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Staff by College/Department/Division/College of Engineering, Design and Physical Sciences/Dept of Computer Science-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Staff by College/Department/Division/College of Engineering, Design and Physical Sciences/Dept of Computer Science/Computer Science-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/Brunel Business School - URCs and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/Brunel Business School - URCs and Groups/Centre for Research into Entrepreneurship, International Business and Innovation in Emerging Markets-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Health Sciences and Social Care - URCs and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Health Sciences and Social Care - URCs and Groups/Brunel Institute for Ageing Studies-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Health Sciences and Social Care - URCs and Groups/Brunel Institute of Cancer Genetics and Pharmacogenomics-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Health Sciences and Social Care - URCs and Groups/Centre for Systems and Synthetic Biology-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Information Systems, Computing and Mathematics - URCs and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Information Systems, Computing and Mathematics - URCs and Groups/Multidisclipary Assessment of Technology Centre for Healthcare (MATCH)-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Computer Science Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.docx249.55 kBUnknownView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.